Perhaps do some editing/self-reflection before making public posts like this.Your writing would make me extremely wary of taking your course and of any claims you make. You know sometimes people write bad reviews.a method won't work for everyone.Īfter reading this post and reviewing Binary Solutions' website, everything about you and your company just feels off. > So get the facts first- hand of you are reading this, and when you read something about us make sure to cross-check (eg, read the filtered reviews on Yelp), cause test prep is big business, and companies are known to post in the blogosphere. WTF is "bright line"? Why is it more natural? How is it more rapid? Which makes the approach more natural and Rapid than any other. And we don't require that you identify the question either - because the method is based on a semantic deconstruction - so you learn to solve as you read. > Our small, smart course has dealt with attacks since it's inception- and for good reason - it's still the simplest, most powerful solution to the LSAT, and reduces each question on the LSAT to a single, bright line, either-or adjudication. You market your course here and in the same sentence attack other people for doing the same? > I could go on in detail, but it's best to just see the best course at one of our free previews at NYU (next one is in Feb 13-14, RSVP here as for this thread it's clearly the product of competitors, and predictably culminates in a link to another prep course. And Mike Kim would like to have a word with you about your book being the only book/course available that covers the entire LSAT in one volume (and his book is sitting at 4.5/5 stars on Amazon with over 160 reviews).
A Casebook contains a collection of typical and boundary cases organized along the lines of a theory of classification. > Furthermore, BinSol is, and remains the ONLY complete and general solution for the LSAT, and has the only Casebook that completely explains the LSAT in one volume because it is a true Casebook (not just a collection of past LSAT questions). ? Just makes you sound arrogant ? A lot of companies have been around just as long as yours. > (a section I cracked long before most of today's companies existed). > I was invited by the then-Dean of Minority Admissions (Dean V Amory) to provide the course at the law school after she saw the videos of my games algorithm True, based on this article from Columbia's student paper in 1997: >not only did I teach the Binary Solution course at Columbia Law School (and subsequently at the College) The suspicions/concerns raised there definitely have merit. Here is the original thread she is referring to. Well, I just saw this post and want to clear up a few things
0 kommentar(er)
